According to Kern it is possible to use a six-step approach to curriculum development for Medical Education: start make bets on world cup and win with favbet
click to see more ice watch horloge for Monnickendam customers.
The most important step is the first one, the general needs assessment (GNA). The goal of step 1 is to focus the curriculum, by defining the deficits in knowledge, attitude, or skills that currently exist in practitioners and the ideal approach to teaching and learning these objectives. When completed, the GNA makes a strong argument for the need for the curriculum and identifies potential educational research questions.
Research for this step can extend over many fields of endeavor: public health and epidemiology, health care systems, utilization and resources, emerging knowledge of disease, patient support groups, and educational theory and practice.
A well-researched step 1 impacts steps beyond the learner objectives by identifying educational methodologies, faculty development resources, potential funding resources, and opportunities for dissemination of the curriculum.
Identification and critical analysis of the health care problem that will be addressed by the curriculum requires substantial research to analyze what is currently being done by practitioners and educators, i.e., the current approach, and ideally what should be done by practitioners and educators to address the health care problem, i.e., the ideal approach. The general needs assessment is usually stated as the knowledge, attitude, and performance deficits that the curriculum will address.
The general needs assessment is applied to targeted learners. What kind of doctor do we want to educate it depends mostly on social needs but it can reflect job opportunities, financial rewards and attitudes acquired during process of studding. Sometimes it is very difficult to make balance between these several needs. Needs can be obtained on different ways. It can be done through study of errors in practice. It is very difficult to design curriculum which will fully meet the needs of society and students. Following picture present the relation between needs of different subjects.
Expectations of society from graduate students are view from one perspective. For example, according to the European Qualifications Framework graduate students should possess following performances:
If we ask students what they expect from their knowledge after graduation we will probably get another list of expectations.
Curriculum of medical faculties must be designed on the way which can provide performances after the student graduation asked from society but from student as well.
At the base of the general needs and needs of targeted learners should be made essential documents for every institution, the mission statement. Mission statement can include just generalized reasons for existing of institution, but it can be more concrete and include several aspects of student’s knowledge like: theoretical knowledge, skills, performances etc.
The mission statement should partly give sort of picture, what kind of graduated student do we want. Involvement of the key subjects in process of curriculum development should be from the early stages of process of curriculum development, and one of the first steps is creation of mission statement of institution. All stakeholders of institution should be included in this process, and they all should give their view of the reasons why the institution exists.
In the process of defining of mission statement for medical institutions, it is recommendable to include all stakeholders such as: representatives of ministries of health, health care institutions accrediting agencies and scholarly societies and ministries of education. Stakeholders will ensure: financial, political and all other support which mission ask for in the process of implementation of new one or reformed curriculum. Some authors propose strong relationship with other educational institutions that are similar in certain aspects with the institution which try to define its mission.
Mission of B&H medical faculties covers following areas:
III Medical services and health care
IV Role in society health care
Institution should define overall goals and aims for the curriculum. Specific measurable knowledge, skill/ performance, attitude, and process objectives should be stated for the curriculum.
Learning goals and outputs for every course and subject should be compatible with mission of institution. It means that achieving of learning goals of different subjects and courses will lead to reaching mission of institution at the end of student studding process. Planning of new curriculum and reform of old one asks for defining of philosophy which is ` behind ` the curriculum and all its elements. Learning goal and outputs should also determinate the educational philosophy and institutional culture. So, mission of institution, educational philosophy and institutional culture are key elements of educational settings necessary for curriculum implementation.
An aim indicates the direction or orientation of a course in terms of its content. An aim is written in terms of level, teaching intentions and management of learning. The aims of the course encapsulate the purpose of the course and what the institution trying to do in providing the course. Aims are therefore more about teaching and the management of learning.
Learning Outcome is an expression of what a student will demonstrate on the successful completion of a course. Learning outcomes are related to the level of the learning; indicate the intended gain in knowledge and skills that a typical student will achieve and should be capable of being assessed. Learning outcomes are more about the learning that is actually to be achieved by the learner. Outcomes ten formulated as competences. The outcomes are coherent with the educational vision. These objectives make it also clear to the student what may be expected of the course.
The aims and learning outcomes of a course should determine the choice of teaching processes through which the module is presented. The teaching processes should be matched to the processes required of the student in attaining the intended learning outcomes of the course. Since a course will normally have several intended outcomes, different components of the course will be suited to different teaching and learning processes, and such a course should be presented through a variety of appropriate methods.
(Educational) objectives are the end qualifications that are aimed to be reached by the student at the end of the study program. Curriculum is in continuous process of tuning objectives to the expectations of external actors (stakeholders) and internal actors (clients)
Tuning of curriculum and objectives clarifies which course subjects or which groups of subjects contribute to the different objectives.
CATHALOGUE OF LEARNING SKILLS AND OBJECTIVES
Very important step is identification of attributes expected of medical graduates. Once these attributes are identified, educators must translate them into meaningful learning objectives.
It is recommendable that every medical school has a catalogue of skills and knowledge, the document where all the theoretical and practical knowledge which student should have after graduation is listed. This document is based on mission statement of institution and it is derived from the learning goals and outputs of all courses inside curriculum.
It is necessary to make a plan how to maximize the impact of the curriculum, which content should be included, how content should be organized and with which educational methods, how elements of curriculum should communicate, what kind of educational environment and climate should be developed. Content which is included must provide to student critical thinking. It must be selected and organized on the way to initiate critical approach to facts and development skill of information retrieval.
Document with the objectives, should be prepared in advance. Content of certain courses should provide better understanding of other subject, for example anatomy and physiology, radiology and anatomy etc. Position of each course is one of the aspects which should be analyzed. Mostly at the first study years basic sciences are taught and they provide continuation of studying with clinical subjects. Some models of curricula prescribe modules as organizational unit which includes knowledge starting from basic science and anatomy and physiology till patho-physiology, clinical diagnostic and treatment. New trends in modern education show signs of introducing an early contact of students and patients in the curriculum, and thus courses such as introduction in clinical practice have among the others the best possible preparation of medical students for studying clinical subjects etc.
Some possible educational strategies:
Student centered/ teacher centered
Student centered strategy ask for active role of student in process of definition of curriculum, decision about learning methodology and decision what and when they will study. Second strategy is based on teacher decisions what, when and how will certain subject be studied.
Problem solving/ information gathering
Problem solving strategy is based on student acquiring of knowledge through process of clinical problem solving. Information gathering is a strategy based on student presentation of gathered information.
Integrated multidisciplinary approach
This strategy is based on integration of different disciplines. Mostly integration is made around certain organ systems. Basic sciences, preclinical and clinical subjects are integrated around the organ system which they studied.
Community based/ hospital based
Community based teaching is educational strategy based on studying in community health centers, while in hospital based strategy educational process is based on hospitals which represent teaching base for faculty.
In elective strategy studying process is organized on the way that all students have the same core curriculum while they choose certain aspects which they want to study more deeply through elective courses. In standard curriculum all students have same curriculum without possibility to choose elective subjects.
Systematic planned/ opportunistic
In systematic approach teaching and learning experience are planned. In opportunistic approach student follow the experience of departmental doctor as it is.
A plan for implementation, including timelines and resources required, should be created. A plan for faculty development is made to assure consistent implementation.
Management of curriculum implementation
Clear responsibility of certain bodies, comities and individuals should be one of key elements in the process of curriculum implementation. Role of the students in process of curriculum management should be clearly defined. The committee for coordination among courses in order to synchronize objectives of courses and overall curriculum should be established. Clear feedback on customer requests should be defined.
Very important aspect of successful implementation of curriculum is teaching environment and fact whether the atmosphere inside the institution is encouraging for the people with ideas, initiatives and cooperation among students. It is desirable to establish a sort of “department of curriculum development”. The role of this department should be strengthening and expanding of faculty and curriculum development programs at the medical school and its clinical affiliates, with the purpose of enriching and advancing the school's educational mission. It should play a key role in the educational activities of the medical school, it works in collaboration with faculty to design, implement, and assess new courses, innovative teaching methods, and distance learning and educational technology initiatives. This department should provide programs in numerous aspects of classroom and clinical teaching, so that faculty can expand their knowledge base in education and enhance their teaching skills; develops workshops and seminars upon faculty request; assists individual faculty who would like to improve their teaching; and provides faculty with consultation on and assistance with projects in medical education
One of the obstacles which may occur in process of curricular change is organizational structure of institution. Too much independent departures with huge level of autonomy can be problem in case that we want to implement curriculum which ask for strong inter-relations and cooperation’s among departments. Sharing of financial and all other funds which are available for the curricular reform can be one of the reasons for misunderstanding between departments. It has been found that strong collaboration among departments is one of the preconditions for successful curricular reform. Possible reason for that might be better flow of information and ideas among departments. New modern curricula ask for interdisciplinary approach in curricular reform and from that reason it is very important to have departments which are more oriented to collaborative approach.
One of the key problems which may occur is the process of extension of one course and its size in comparison with others. This problem is evident in the time of fast enlargement of medical knowledge what gives possibility for uncontrolled growth of subjects. To solve this problem it is necessary to put learning goals of subject into context of mission of overall institution. An additional aspect which has to carefully plan is vertical and horizontal coherency of subjects and flow of student existing knowledge among them.
Organization of courses inside curriculum must be done in accordance with the needs which are derived from the mission statement of the institution.
Finding of appropriate ratio between different subjects in aspects of time and quantity of number of lessons and exercises is a special problem. The ratio between theoretical and practical teaching should be made in that way that final student knowledge is the highest possible level of the Millers pyramid of knowledge. According to modern trends in education and following by certain suggestions in Bologna declaration it has to be 60% of practical, and 40 % of theoretical work.
Special accent is put into integration of different courses inside curriculum. The vertical and horizontal curriculum coherency of the course must be provided. By integration we mean that the position of certain course inside curriculum is very precisely determined. Its position is based on the student previous knowledge, and it should make student able to follow the teaching process on other courses at the same academic year. Student learning achievements at the end of certain course should make student able for the following of the teaching process at the next academic year. Overlapping between medical courses in term of same learning objectives should be minimized.
The criteria for selection of course contents are often complex due to involvement of different factors like interests of people planning the curriculum or the influence of the different departments in the institution (Alshehri, 2001).There is a tendency to add and a resistance to reduce or replace the previous topics in the contents of core curriculum (Zakrzewska et al., 2003) as reduction in content may compromise the resources, financial support and power
“There is a persevere drive towards an unrealistic degree of completeness in the curricula reinforced by the reluctance of departments to lessen their teaching time and of teachers to shorten their course content” (GMC, 1993).
Definition and organization of the course inside curriculum include:
The problem of curriculum implementation is even more complicated in elective education strategy.
As the core content is a relatively new idea in medical education, there is no consensus on the method of selecting the knowledge, skills and attitudes to be included in such a curriculum. One of the key problems in this strategy is how to identify what constitutes the core curriculum. Some of the methods are documented by Kemahli et al. (2004) reporting the process of identification of core curriculum for their faculty at the Ankara University. They started with the formulation of mission and vision statement, and the aims and objectives of the departments as well as undergraduate curriculum. Initially they identified the core clinical topics that a doctor at graduation is supposed to know using their specified criteria. Clinical and basic science knowledge, skills and attitudes were then specified for these topics again using check criteria.
According to Rolfe et al. (2002) the process of identification of the core curriculum should be in cooperation with range of stakeholders. First it should be identified the list of core clinical conditions identified from literature following by refined list by consulting directors of clinical training, faculty, nurses, registrars and interns. Finally a list was produced in respect to four levels of skills which at each condition should be managed by the interns: theoretical knowledge, recognizing of symptoms and signs; preliminary investigations, management and/or treatment; total investigation, management and/ or treatment.
Haddad et al. (1997) discuss the dilemma of criteria for the selection of a topic as core- what should be included and why as core? Initially they agreed on the basic terms of reference: to aim at knowledge level appropriate for GP/casualty officer; to maintain system-based approach; to follow a problem-oriented approach; to adopt the grid structure as an expression format. After that they set the criteria for a topic to be considered as core. For example: it is common; has serious impact on health; has a screening program; can be study model of certain concepts; is of ethical or legal importance; has local flavor; and is of future importance. They also classified the knowledge into 5 levels; know that a thing exists; know to which group it belongs; think of it as a possibility; know how to confirm the condition; know what to do about the condition; know all the details.
Teaching methods for certain course must be carefully selected. It has to provide to the students although having different habits the same possibilities for adoption of the knowledge. The methodology must be suitable to provide life-long learning and the capacity for the application of student’s knowledge in the practice. Methodologies can be selected according to the human and technical capacities of the institution. It has to respect educational philosophy of the institution. Modern educational institution follow student centered approach in their philosophy.
Teaching methodologies must provide the “active process of learning. When we want to implement new curriculum we have to reconsider two main questions related with good settlement of teaching methodologies:
size of the student group
which teaching tool should we use
Size of the group can be influenced with learning objective and some of the objectives are more achievable in the small group while other ones can be reached in large groups or in the individual work. Limits of the space and number of staff can be the facts which can prevent such approach. Combination of work in large and small groups can be used.
Finding suitable technical tools which are the most suitable for certain learning goals is second important issue. These tools should offer student possibility to choose tool, time and place where to learn. Certain tools can be used in some particular context, but mostly all tools can be used in all settings. Using of different tools depends on course objectives, technical possibilities of institution and possibility of staff to use certain technical equipment. Variety of teaching tool such as: computers, slides, posters, videotape, audiotape, cameras, simulators, patients should be available to teaching staff but to students as well. Certain teaching tool can be more suitable for work with some particular size of the group for example computers can be used for individual work. Combination of using of teaching tools can be used for teaching units. Free choice of student election of teaching tool according to his wishes would be ideal for success of teaching process.
Teaching is a demanding and complex task. Implicit in the widely accepted and far-reaching changes in medical education is a changing role for the medical teacher. Twelve roles have been identified and these can be grouped in six areas in the model presented:
As presented in the model, some roles require more medical expertise and others more educational expertise. Some roles have more direct face-to-face contact with students and others less. The roles are presented in a 'competing values' framework-they may convey conflicting messages, e.g. providing information or encouraging independent learning, helping students or examining their competence. The role model framework is of use in the assessment of the needs for staff to implement a curriculum, in the appointment and promotion of teachers and in the organization of a staff development program. Some teachers will have only one role. Most teachers will have several roles. All roles, however, need to be represented in an institution or teaching organization. This has implications for the appointment of staff and for staff training. Where there are insufficient numbers of appropriately trained existing staff to meet a role requirement, staff must be reassigned to the role, where this is possible, and the necessary training provided. Alternatively, if this is not possible or deemed desirable, additional staff needs to be recruited for the specific purpose of fulfilling the role identified. A 'role profile' needs to be negotiated and agreed with staff at the time of their appointment and this should be reviewed on a regular basis.
The role of performance assessment in outcome based education is one of the most important. Issues of the relevancy of assessment to student learning are highlighted in the context of outcome-based education. It is desirable to prepare implementation guidelines of assessment programs in outcome-based education due the fact that these assessments are key features of such programs.
In order to implement successfully new curriculum or reform old one it is essential to have staff trained who will be main force in curriculum implementation. Instruction should scan and predict special human needs in sense of qualification and knowledge necessary for better efficiency in their work. People like to feel self/respected, self accomplished, safety and that’s the way the new requests are appearing in new curriculum. Staff needed, can be different depending on the nature of innovations in curriculum? Staff training should be an ongoing process. Training should be opportunity for staff to discuss about many problems and aspects of curriculum implementation. Leadership skills training is special aspect of this human development training programs. Leaders are necessary for promotion of new systems of values, educational philosophy. They have to mobilize other human resources to maintain the curricular change momentum.
Evaluation of curriculum presents the final stage inside cyclic process of improvement and development of curriculum.
Without evaluation procedure it would be hard to imagine monitoring of institution progress toward desired needs. This process is necessary to provide the evidences that institution made a step in the right direction, as well as useful information to stakeholders. It helps in the process of identification of problems inside curriculum and institution, solving of problems and redesigning of certain aspects of curriculum. Evaluation can be performed as short-term and long-term evaluation. Short-term evaluation has a role of “friendly” criticism, while the long term evaluation is a crucial one, with much deeper impact. Department for quality assurance is usually in charge for conducting of such procedures and it is up to them to decide about many aspects of this process.
Evaluation of curriculum can be made through evaluation of many different aspects as:
It is very important to carefully define the appropriate time for evaluation for each of these areas as well as the methods for its measuring. Evaluation will only have full meaning if it is followed by action in order to improve areas which are estimated as weak points of curriculum. This action is obligatory for relevant bodies and management structures and should be described precisely inside document policy agreement.